Degenerative Myelopathy of German Shepherd Dogs:
Introduction:
Degenerative Myelopathy (DM) was first described as a specific degenerative neurologic
disease in 1973. Since then, much has been done to understand the processes involved in the disease
and into the treatment of DM. Hopefully, this will help you understand the problem and to explain
further the steps that can be taken to help dogs afflicted with DM.
The age at onset is 5 to 14 years, which corresponds to the third to sixth decades of human
life. Although a few cases have been reported in other large breeds of dogs, the disease appears with
relative frequency only in the German Shepherd breed, suggesting that there is a genetic
predisposition for German Shepherd dogs (GSD) in developing DM. The work presented here and
by others on the nature of DM has been performed in the German Shepherd breed. Care must be
taken in extrapolating this information to other breeds of dogs. It is currently not known whether the
exact condition exists in other breeds of dogs. Many dogs may experience a spinal cord disease
(myelopathy) which is chronic and progressive (degenerative); but, unless they are caused by the
same immune-related disease which characterizes DM of GSD, the treatments described herein may
be ineffectual. The breeds for which there is data to suggest that they also suffer from DM of GSD
are the Belgium Shepherd, Old English Sheep Dog, Rhodesian Ridgeback, Weimaraner and,
probably, Great Pyrenees. Confirmation of the diagnosis is important in other breeds before
assuming that they have DM of GSD.
Diagnosis of DM is made by a history of progressive spinal ataxia and weakness that may
have a waxing and waning course or be steadily progressive. This is supported by the neurologic
findings of a diffuse thoracolumbar spinal cord dysfunction. Clinical pathologic examinations are
generally normal except for an elevated cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) protein in the lumbar cistern.
Electromyographic (EMG) examination reveals no lower motor unit disease, supporting the
localization of the disease process in the white matter pathways of the spinal cord. Spinal cord
evoked potentials recorded during the EMG do show changes which help determine the presence
of spinal cord disease. Radiographs of the spinal column including myelography are normal (other
than old age changes) in uncomplicated DM. Unfortunately, myelography can be associated with
worsening of clinical signs and carries some degree of risk for certain patients.
Dogs afflicted with DM have depressed lymphocyte blastogenesis to plant mitogens. The
depression of their cell mediated immune responses correlates with the clinical stage and severity
of the disease. Furthermore, this suppression has been shown to be due to the genesis of a circulating
suppressor cell. Some dogs with DM exhibit antigen-binding cells specific to canine myelin basic
protein. Immunoglobulins have been shown to be bound within lesions within the spinal cords of
dogs with DM. These patients also show increased circulating immune-complexes in their sera. The
antigens in these immune-complexes have been examined and appear to be markers of inflammation
as they have been found to exist in patients who have other inflammatory diseases of the central
nervous system. 2-Dimensional electrophoresis of CSF proteins indicates that the elevated proteins
in the CSF of DM patients represent changes which are related to inflammation. While these
changes are not specific for DM, the other conditions in which the inflammatory proteins have been
found in CSF can be differentiated by clinical signs. The 2-dimensional electrophoresis of CSF
proteins appears to be one of the most specific change seen in DM. Recently, we have found that
CSF levels of the enzyme, acetylcholinesterase, are elevated in patients with DM. Again, this occurs
in other forms of central nervous system inflammation in dogs. However, when combined with the
history, neurologic signs, CSF protein concentration and EMG, the elevated CSF
acetylcholinesterase level helps confirm the diagnosis. This allows the inclusion of DM in the
diagnosis, even if other problems are uncovered during the examination.
The gross pathologic examination of dogs with DM generally is not contributory toward the
diagnosis. The striking features being the reduction of rear limb and caudal axial musculature. The
microscopic neural tissue lesions consist of widespread demyelination of the spinal cord, with the
greatest concentration of lesions in the thoracolumbar spinal cord region. In severely involved areas,
there is also a reduced number of axons, an increased number of astroglial cells and an increased
density of small vascular elements. In the thoracic spinal cord, nearly all funiculi are vacuolated.
Similar lesions are occasionally seen scattered throughout the white matter of the brains from some
dogs, as well. Many patients have evidence of plasma cell infiltrates in the kidneys on throughout
the gastrointestinal tract, providing a hint to the underlying immune disorder causing DM.
During the past two decades, at the University of Florida, have provided important new
insights into the pathoetiology of DM. The release of antigens during the disease process could
explain the immune deficits seen in DM and suggests that processing these immune-complexes by
circulating macrophages leads to the development of the circulating suppressor cells that were
previously noted. This provides a logical explanation for the presence of immune abnormalities in
GSD with DM. Electrophoresis of immune-complexes demonstrates that the proteins present are
inflammatory proteins which increase in inflammatory diseases of the dog nervous system. It is hoped that working with the antigens present in the immune-complexes will lead to a major
breakthrough in our understanding of DM and that this also could lead to an early serodiagnostic test
for the condition. However, the development of a serodiagnostic test will await the availability of
antibodies specific to unique markers within the inflammatory proteins of DM dog
immune-complexes.
While the cause of the altered immune system is not known, what is increasingly clear is that
DM is caused by an autoimmune disease attacking the nervous systems of patients, leading to
progressive neural tissue damage. In many respects, DM is similar to what has been discovered
about the pathogenesis of Multiple Sclerosis in human beings. In fact, based upon new data
concerning the pathology of MS, we can now say with some degree of certainty that DM is MS in
dogs. We believe that, due to some triggering factor, immune-complexes circulate. These
immune-complexes lead to endothelial cell damage in the vessels of the CNS. Subsequently, fibrin
is deposited in the perivascular spaces. When this degrades (point of action of aminocaproic acid),
inflammatory cells are stimulated to migrate into the lesions. The inflammatory cells release
prostaglandins and cytokines (point of action of vitamin E and C) which leads to the activation of
tissue enzymes and the formation of oxygen free-radicals (point of action of acetylcysteine) which,
in turn, leads to tissue damage. Treatment of DM of GSD, which we recommend, is directed at these
pathologic processes.
TRATAMIENTO DE LA MIELOPATIA DEGENERATIVA DEL PASTOR ALEMAN
FUENTE: Universidad de Florida (USA)
|